Showing posts with label Journalism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Journalism. Show all posts

Thursday, March 25, 2010

"We Tell Stories . . . " : Joan Didion

PUBLISHED IN 1970, Joan Didion's,The White Album, is a scrapbook of the political/pop culture landscape of California of the late 60s and 70s. California, and Los Angeles in particular, was lucky to have such an eye turned on the length of its expanse. Deeply reported and even more deeply felt, Didion is able to convey not just political climate, social disarray and personal upheaval but the very texture of the era's tensions, fears, confusion and sense of possibility. As a journalist and essayist, Didion set not just a tone but presented a different template. She was a model for many aspiring reporters and writers who wanted to dig deeper and peer behind perception. Her stories had more than resonance they left an afterimage.

As we turn the corner and begin to contemplate your final pieces -- writing the Los Angeles you see into being, we'll be looking at different writers -- journalists, essayists -- who have left indelible impressions about their Los Angeles. As you think about putting together your reported observations, think about creative ways to weave the facts with observations. Details, very simply set down, are often key in writing prose that draws you in with its careful rhythms.

Here is a sample from The White Album in which Didion recollects the night that the Manson Family murders were set in motion:

"We put 'Lay Lady Lay' on the record player, and 'Suzanne.' We went down to Melrose Avenue to see the Flying Burritos. There was a jasmine vine grown over the verandah of the big house on Franklin Avenue, and in the evenings the smell of jasmine came in through all the open doors and windows. I made bouillabaisse for people who did not eat meat. I imagined that my own life was simple and sweet, and sometimes it was, but there were odd things going around town. There were rumors. There were stories. Everything was unmentionable but nothing was unimaginable. This mystical flirtation with the idea of 'sin' -- this sense that it was possible to go 'too far,' and that many people were doing it -- was very much with us in Los Angeles in 1968 and 1969. A demented and seductive vortical tension was building in the community. The jitters were setting in. I recall a time when the dogs barked every night and the moon was always full. On August 9, 1969, I was sitting in the shallow end of my sister-in-law's swimming pool in Beverly Hills when she received a telephone call from a friend who had just heard about the murders at Sharon Tate Polanski's house on Cielo Drive. The phone rang many times during the next hour. These early reports were garbled and contradictory. One caller would say hoods, the next would say chains. There were twenty dead, no twelve, ten, eighteen. Black masses were imagined, band bad trips blamed. I remember all of the day's misinformation very clearly, and I also remember this, and wish I did not: I remember that no one was surprised."

-- L.G.


photo credit: academy of achievement

Thursday, February 18, 2010

The Profile: Ebert on Movies

THIS, of course, is not quite about L.A. but it is about the "factory" that makes its home here: Hollywood and movies. Last night we talked about the arc of the profile and I shared some samples of stories with the class. I'll be sending you links to other well-crafted, lyric, provocative, moving profiles but I wanted to post Chris Jones' Esquire profile about film critic Roger Ebert's battle with cancer here and, today, Ebert's own response in the Chicago Sun-Times, his hometown paper. Below, a sample that speaks to what we discussed about observation and a writer's choices (note the comment about the "commissioned portrait"):

It was also well written, I thought. "When I turned to it in the magazine, I got a jolt from the full-page photograph of my jaw drooping. Not a lovely sight. But then I am not a lovely sight, and in a moment I thought, well, what the hell. It's just as well it's out there. That's how I look, after all. . . . . My theory was that if Chris had an article to write it was not my place to write it for him as a favorable press release about myself. Let him write what he observed. Oliver Cromwell is said to have commissioned an official painting of himself, "warts and all." He apparently never said any such thing, was misquoted a century after his death, and his official portrait showed no warts, but never mind: He should have said it."


-- L.G.
photo caption: Film crtic, Roger Ebert
photo credit:
Esquire magazine

Saturday, February 13, 2010

Chandlertown -- Harry


COMING SOON to a screen near you -- as in your classroom -- we'll be looking at how Los Angeles was "invented" -- dreamed and coaxed into existence -- by a newspaper. Not just any newspaper-- but the Los Angeles Times and the influential family behind it, the Chandlers. The documentary, Inventing L.A., directed by Emmy-award winner, Peter Jones, examines four generations of Chandlers and their "rule" of Los Angeles. Led by the patriarch, Harry Chandler, (who took over the paper in 1917 after his father-in-law, Col. Harrison Gray Otis's death in 1917), the Chandlers saw L.A. -- still an arid, sprawling afterthought -- as "a city of the future" and were determined to make it such, truly by any means necessary. From the PBS description:
"For four generations, the Chandlers wielded unique influence through their newspaper. In their pursuit of personal agendas and civic ideals, they built the city of the future, but also exposed the dark side of the American dream."

-- L.G.

top photo caption: "City of Destiny," screengrab from PBS.'s Inventing L.A.
photo credit: PBS
bottom photo caption: Harry Chandler
photo credit: babcock ancestry

writing l.a. . . .

writing l.a. . . .